The Science of Reading refers to a vast body of research conducted over the past 50+ years across fields like:
sciences
If your child struggles with reading comprehension, teaching them comprehension strategies (like making predictions or summarizing) often isn’t enough—and likely isn’t what they need.
In most cases, students struggle with comprehension because of gaps in decoding or language comprehension—the two core components in the Simple View of Reading. Until those foundational skills are strong, true reading comprehension won’t develop.
That’s why our programs focus on building the right skills, in the right order—so students can become confident, independent readers who actually understand what they read.
In 2001, researcher Hollis Scarborough introduced The Reading Rope to illustrate the many strands that work together to build skilled reading.
Each strand—like phonemic awareness, letter-sound knowledge, vocabulary, and background knowledge—falls under one of two key areas: decoding and language comprehension. As these strands become stronger and more automatic, reading comprehension improves.
For educators, the rope gives us a clear visual of what to assess and what to teach when a student is struggling. Instead of guessing, we can pinpoint the exact strand that needs support—and build from there.
The brain isn’t naturally wired to read—but thanks to neuroplasticity, we can build new pathways that make reading possible.
Brain imaging studies show that after just five hours of explicit phonics instruction, non readers begin forming connections between the brain’s visual and speech centers.
Mastering the full English code takes time—typically 2 to 3 years—but those neural changes can begin almost immediately.
With Structured Literacy, we use the science of reading and the brain’s ability to adapt to wire students for reading success.
Structured Literacy is the only research-backed approach proven to work for all learners—including those with dyslexia and other reading challenges.
It includes both what we teach and how we teach it.
Most schools still use balanced literacy or whole language approaches, but research shows those methods only work for about 40% of students. That means the majority are left behind—especially students with dyslexia or other reading difficulties.
Structured Literacy is different. It’s explicit, systematic, and rooted in how the brain learns to read.
And here’s the most important part:
95%+ of students can learn to read when taught with Structured Literacy.
That’s why we don’t reserve it just for struggling readers. It’s the approach we use with every child, because it’s the most effective path to strong, confident reading.
Just like with reading, there’s a science behind how students learn math. The Science of Math is grounded in research about how children process mathematical concepts, build number sense, and move from concrete thinking to abstract reasoning.
This evidence-based approach supports visual, hands-on, and developmentally appropriate instruction—so students understand why math works, not just how to memorize steps.
CRA stands for Concrete–Representational–Abstract, a three-step instructional model proven to help students build deep, lasting math understanding.
This method bridges the gap between doing math and understanding it—and it’s especially effective for students who struggle with traditional instruction.